It's rough draft writing. She says so in the introduction. I think they'll discover the misspelling on their own.
Old Goat
JoinedPosts by Old Goat
-
10
I think it's remarkable
by Old Goat ini think it's remarkable that real watch tower history exists, despite the watchtower society's attempts to control the message.
by now, everyone who reads my posts knows i'm a fan of the truthhistory.blogspot.com blog.
and of the new book, a separate identity.
-
-
-
10
I think it's remarkable
by Old Goat ini think it's remarkable that real watch tower history exists, despite the watchtower society's attempts to control the message.
by now, everyone who reads my posts knows i'm a fan of the truthhistory.blogspot.com blog.
and of the new book, a separate identity.
-
-
Old Goat
I think it's remarkable that real watch tower history exists, despite the Watchtower Society's attempts to control the message. By now, everyone who reads my posts knows I'm a fan of the truthhistory.blogspot.com blog. And of the new book, A Separate Identity. I've just come from reading the newest article on their blog. You should read it. I'm so pleased with the detail. Why didn't the Watchtower write something like this? Simple, direct history, let the chips fall where they may. I would respect them more for it.
The one point I found most interesting is the comment that Paton continued to consider himself a clergyman and lived off his preaching. Maybe he would have done better by staying a farmer. As I watch this history develop, I find my self bemused that one of the authors (Schulz) who is a Witness (Dr. de Vienne isn't a Witness) can write with this detail and de-mythify Watchtower propaganda. In the interests of full disclosure, I worked with Mr. (Dr?) Schulz way back in the day at District Conventions. He's one of the few Witnesses I continue to respect.
-
143
Letter to BOE: Adjustment in process for appointing elders and ministerial servants
by pixel inhello, you read it here first!.
governing body of jehovah's witnesses.
to all congregations.
-
-
Old Goat
They appointed on the basis of the Circ Ov's recomendation anyway. Not much of a change. The issue isn't who appoints; it's that they provide no real training or education for elders. None. None that matters.
So ... if an elder turns out to be a pedophile, do we get to sue the circuit overseen?
-
143
Letter to BOE: Adjustment in process for appointing elders and ministerial servants
by pixel inhello, you read it here first!.
governing body of jehovah's witnesses.
to all congregations.
-
-
Old Goat
What was the date of the letter?
I'm tired of the faked-up first century parallels. Why not just say, "We wont to be the Catholic church but with our own doctrine."
-
7
This book is superior. Read it!
by Old Goat init will give you an understanding of the watchtower you did not have.. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvrhws2lnje.
.
-
-
-
7
This book is superior. Read it!
by Old Goat init will give you an understanding of the watchtower you did not have.. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvrhws2lnje.
.
-
-
Old Goat
superior to any other so called history of the watchtower.
-
7
This book is superior. Read it!
by Old Goat init will give you an understanding of the watchtower you did not have.. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvrhws2lnje.
.
-
-
Old Goat
It will give you an understanding of the Watchtower you did not have.
-
42
Great Crowd is NOT under the New Covenant...Where does it say this?
by Christ Alone ini was wondering if there was anywhere someone could point to in the bible for the watchtower belief that the great crowd is not included in the new covenant.
i know that this is their line of thinking when it comes to jesus being mediator.
they say that jesus is only mediator of the new covenant and since the gc is not under the new covenant, jesus is not specifically a mediator to them.
-
-
Old Goat
The verse you've quoted is about conversion. A change in status from being a stranger obligated by the land's law covenant to being a convert, a sort of adopted israelite. The fact remains the Old Covenant was with Israel. This really has nothing to do with who is in the new covenant. As I said earlier, God knows his own. It doesn't matter what the watchtower says, believes or teaches. Noone who God saves loses his salvation because of a human teaching.
For the sake of accuracy, even the watchtower teaches that God saves those not in the new covenant. They use 1 john to teach that. On that point i have no argument. God saves through his son. It's that concept that matters to me.
I don't think we can use the old covenant to mirror the new. The new covenant is specifically 'not like' the old one. The old convicted of sin. The new brings salvation. Watchtower teaching is that it is the basis for the salvation of all. Fine. I agree with that. Do I think the parties to the new covenant were limited to a spiritual israel and God with Jesus as mediator? I don't know. The answer rests in what the israel of god is. I'm not sure i see that point as essential anyway. What is essential is God's will to save. No doctrine of men can change that or determin who will be saved or to what destiny.
The two classes of saved argument is an old one, extending back to the 19th Century. I've read the arguments. I know Watchtower doctrine. I remain skeptical of it all though I have my personal preferences. Personal preferences, personal understandings, should remain personal unless they are backed by scripture. I'm unsettled, so I'll leave them unexpressed. However, one should note that benefiting from the old covenant did not make one a party to it. Captive slaves, while not parties to the Law Covenant, benefited in many ways. They were freed from religious prostitution. Their children wouldn't be burned in Molech's furnace. But they were not parties to the covenant.
Your slavation does not depend on your (or anyone else's) understanding of a covenant. It depends on God who saves us through Christ.
-
42
Great Crowd is NOT under the New Covenant...Where does it say this?
by Christ Alone ini was wondering if there was anywhere someone could point to in the bible for the watchtower belief that the great crowd is not included in the new covenant.
i know that this is their line of thinking when it comes to jesus being mediator.
they say that jesus is only mediator of the new covenant and since the gc is not under the new covenant, jesus is not specifically a mediator to them.
-
-
Old Goat
Typing in caps is no substitute for reason. Exodus 24:2-11 shows that the law covenant was a bilateral covenant made between Israel and God. It wasn't made with anyone else. Others who wanted the benefits had to submit to its ordinances, but they weren't part of the covenant. That the covenant was bilateral is shown by the covenant makers. God was on one side, the representative men of Israel on the other. There were no representatives from the nations outside of Israel.
If you wish to assert something scriptural, use the Bible. Capital letters prove nothing.
-
42
Great Crowd is NOT under the New Covenant...Where does it say this?
by Christ Alone ini was wondering if there was anywhere someone could point to in the bible for the watchtower belief that the great crowd is not included in the new covenant.
i know that this is their line of thinking when it comes to jesus being mediator.
they say that jesus is only mediator of the new covenant and since the gc is not under the new covenant, jesus is not specifically a mediator to them.
-
-
Old Goat
The old covenant wasn't for all God's people. It was for Israel. That there were others who were God's people is evident in the "stranger" concept found in the law. The alien residents had to keep the law if they lived in Israel, but they were not parties to the covenant and the law made exceptions for them.